Friday, November 30, 2012

MASJID GAY DAN AGENDA DAJJAL YANG SEMAKIN ANGKUH

MASJID GAY BAKAL DIBUKA DI PARIS By DRAGANA JOVANOVIC | ABC News – Tue, Nov 27, 2012 ABC News - Gay Mosque to Open in Paris (ABC New... thumbnail 1 summary
MASJID GAY BAKAL DIBUKA DI PARIS
By DRAGANA JOVANOVIC | ABC News – Tue, Nov 27, 2012
ABC News - Gay Mosque to Open in Paris (ABC News)


Ludovic Mohammed Zahed mengundang bahang kontroversi. Beliau seorang Muslim “homoseksual” dan mengaku “pakar” dalam Al-Quran merancang untuk membuka “masjid mesra gay” (Masjid “The Unity”) di Paris menjelang 30 November ini. Ia menganggapnya sebagai tempat perlindungan serta ibadat.

"Kita perlu mempunyai ruang yang selamat bagi orang-orang yang tidak berasa selesa dan selesa dengan norma-norma masjid biasa," Zahed memberitahu ABC News. "Terdapat orang homoseksual yang terdedah pada keganasan, wanita yang tidak mahu memakai tudung kepala dan dipaksa duduk di belakang masjid. Projek ini memberikan harapan kembali kepada orang-orang yang beriman yang banyak di dalam masyarakat saya.”

"Solat biasa yang diamalkan dalam suasana egalitarian dan tanpa apa-apa bentuk diskriminasi berasaskan gender adalah salah satu daripada tiang yang menyokong pembaharuan yang dicadangkan Perwakilan Islam Progresif kami," tambah beliau.

Masjid “The Unity” beliau pada mulanya akan beroperasi di sebuah kuil Buddha di kawasan penempatan di timur Paris. Ia bakal menekankan agar "semua orang menerima setiap golongan sebagai ciptaan Tuhan .... Saya berharap lelaki “bukan homoseksual” akan berdoa bersama-sama dengan lelaki dan wanita “homoseksual” kata Zahed yang enggan mengumumkan lokasi tepat tempat tersebut atas sebab keselamatan.

“Masjid” Zahed akan “menghormati” beberapa tradisi Islam seperti solat Juma’at dan kontrak perkahwinan Islam (Nikah) bagi tujuan “memberkati perkahwinan” sesame jantina. Ia juga akan melaksanakan upacara pengebumian (Janazah) bagi mereka yang telah dinafikan upacara pengebumian Islam tradisional yang berdasarkan undang-undang syariah disebabkan orientasi seksual mereka.

"Ia adalah tempat yang selamat untuk beribadah," menurut Zahed, dimana tiada soalan agama yang tidak akan diabaikan. "Imam kami akan bercakap mengenai sebarang topik tanpa pantang larang." Zahed akan menjadi salah satu daripada tiga Imam, bersama-sama seorang mualaf wanita bangsa Perancis dan seorang lagi lelaki yang sedang dilatih.

"Etika semasa Islam mengecam orientasi seksual," berkata, Zahed "tetapi tiada dalam Islam atau Al-Quran yang melarang homoseksual. Malah, selama berabad-abad, umat Islam tidak pernah melihat homoseksual sebagai kekejian yang melampau sepertimana yang mereka lakukan hari ini."

Menurut Zahed, penyair-penyair Islam terkenal menulis bait-bait yang memuliakan lelaki kacak. Ada yang ditafsirkan sebagai metafora untuk mengasihi Tuhan, tetapi ada juga seolah-olah sebagai rujukan bagi hubungan intim sesame seks. Zahed berhujah bahawa homoseksualiti menjadi jenayah hanya di bawah kolonialisme Eropah.

"Dari ke-10 untuk abad ke-14, masyarakat Islam merupakan gabungan masyarakat yang jauh lebih kaya dari aspek undang-undang, rasional dan mistik," kata Zahed. "Mereka melihat seksualiti sebagai satu aspek potensi kehidupan, dan mereka melihat dalam harapan untuk mendalami aspek kerohanian itu sendiri."

Jika masjid ini menjadi simbol kebebasan baru sekalipun, komuniti gay dan homoseksual tetap akan merasakan diri mereka teraniaya dan dipulaukan, menurut Nasser, seorang homoseksual secara terbuka dari kota Paris.

Walaupun ia akan menjadi masjid pertama gay di Paris, adalah dipercayai terdapat 21 masjid gay lain bertaburan sekitar Amerika Syarikat, Kanada dan Afrika Selatan.

Masjid Paris Zahed akan diilhamkan oleh usaha yang dijalankan oleh kumpulan Umat Islam untuk Nilai Progresif Amerika Utara (Muslims for Progressive Values in North America) yang mengamalkan ibadah dalam suasana egalitarian dan tanpa sebrang bentuk diskriminasi berasaskan seksualiti atau gender.
"Kami bekerja sangat rapat dengan mereka. Idea masjid Paris kami datang sebagai hasil daripada perbualan kami," kata Zahed, yang rancangan masa depan termasuk "sebuah masjid yang progresif di UK dan kemudian satu lagi di Denmark akan mengikuti."

Zahed percaya, jika Nabi Muhamad masih hidup hari ini maka Nabi juga akan membenarkan perkahwinan sama-seks.. Zahed sendiri adalah pasangan gay pertama berkahwin dalam satu majlis "perkahwinan sama-seks Islamik" di Perancis. Beliau adalah seorang pelajar PhD Algeria yang menulis tesis beliau berkenaan Islam dan homoseksualiti, suatu subjek yang turut ditanganinya dalam buku "The Koran and the Flesh."

Beliau telah mengalami pelbagai diskriminasi anti-gay daripada kumpulan-kumpulan Islam, dan Islamofobia daripada ahli-ahli komuniti gay Perancis.

Sementara itu terdapat banyak kontroversi di Perancis mengenai kedua-dua perkahwinan sama-seks dan pengaruh serta amalan Islam. Sepuluh hari lalu, puluhan ribu penunjuk perasaan mengambil jalan-jalan terhadap rancangan kerajaan untuk menghalalkan perkahwinan sama-seks.

Beberapa minggu yang lalu, penunjuk perasaan sayap kanan menyerbu sebuah masjid yang belum selesai untuk menunjukkan tentangan masyarakat Perancis terhadap pendatang Islam yang semakin besar bilangannya.

Wednesday, November 28, 2012

ELITE SATANISM: Satanist Pedophiles Rule Great Britain

Satanist Pedophiles Rule Great Britain November 25, 2012    (l. Jimmy Savil & a younger Tony Blair) Cabalist (Masonic) bank... thumbnail 1 summary
Satanist Pedophiles Rule Great Britain

November 25, 2012 
 
(l. Jimmy Savil & a younger Tony Blair)
Cabalist (Masonic) bankers have empowered a class of perverts they  control through blackmail. Cabalism is Satanism. Mankind has fallen under satanic domination and is unable to discern the difference.


by David Richards
(henrymakow.com)

(David Richards, 24, a Brit who teaches English in Mongolia, is a regular contributor.)

Pedophilia is common practice in the British establishment.

This is difficult for the British public to believe. At our level, pedophilia is a crime heavily punished by the law and condemned by the mainstream media.

However, Illuminati members are above the law and partake in pedophile rings without fear of prosecution.

The Illuminati operate pedophile rings for three main reasons:

1. Most members of the cult have a psychopathic and sadomasochistic psychological make-up, and therefore have perverted sexual desires.

2. Pedophile rings operate as a system of blackmail, enforcing conformity to the NWO. All members of the establishment are vetted by security services. Hidden cameras are placed at child sex parties to gather incriminating material.

3. Perversion is the way Satanists worship.  Just as a Christian might perform works of charity, the Satanist will prey on children.

FOUR EXAMPLES OF ELITE SATANISM

The following cases prove the existence of establishment pedophile rings in Britain. 

1) Gordon Brown - English journalist Mike James claims former Prime Minister Brown is a well-known pedophile. James worked in the mainstream media and was first told of Brown's perversions by Norman Lamont (Chancellor of the Exchequer 1990-93) at a private party in 1986.

He later did his own research into the man, and wrote in 2010:  "Gordon Brown, the current British prime minister, is a practicing pedophile whose activities are known not only to the British, American and Israeli intelligence services, but also by Rupert Murdoch and his senior editor at the Sunday Times."

The fact that intelligence services have dirt on Brown means he is controlled. He can be blackmailed at a moment's notice. Brown became Prime Minister because of his perversions, not in spite of them.

Mike James places Brown as a member of a ring of senior British pedophiles, including Lord Robertson and Lord Peter Mandelson. All of them are major members of Masonic lodges.


2) Thatcher Pedo Ring - It has been revealed that a pedophile ring operated within the Thatcher government (1979-90).

In the 80s a teenage rent boy went to the police claiming he and other boys were sexually abused by top people.

The parties were held by millionaires and attended by British politicians, judges, senior civil servants and members of the European elite. Some of the VIPs were said to have flown in via RAF (Royal Air Force) Northolt on the outskirts of London.

This case has been revealed by the disgruntled former policeman who interviewed the rent boy. He says when he began to investigate the claims, his superior demanded the case was closed.

"It was a case of 'get rid of everything, never say a word to anyone'. It was made very clear to me that to ­continue asking questions would ­jeopardise my career."

3) Sir Jimmy Savile (1926-2011) - for over 40 years Savile presented TV shows aimed at young people.

In recent months he has been exposed as a violent pedophile who abused children over a period of four decades.

With each passing day more people come forward to testify against the dead presenter. Police are currently processing the testimonies of hundreds of victims.

The details are astounding: he abused children who appeared on his television programs, organized pedophile parties with other entertainment stars, and molested sick children in hospitals. A former BBC radio DJ claims he was also a necrophiliac.

However, the most damning reports - and least commented on in the mainstream- are those which reveal Savile took part in establishment pedophile rings.

In 2011, the News of the World newspaper reported that 'Savile is known for supplying a number of high profile MP's with children for them to sexually abuse.'

The article revealed Savile was a regularly visitor to the notorious Haut de la Gaurenne care home in Jersey in the 70s, and was witnessed taking young boys onboard the yacht of former British Prime Minister Ted Heath.

Ex-Jersey deputy police Chief Lenny Harper explains how children were abused on the island:

"We know from court cases and statements made to my team [during a 2008 inquiry] that children in Jersey care homes were 'loaned out' to members of the yachting fraternity and other prominent citizens on the pretence of recreational trips but during which they were savagely abused and often raped. When these children complained, they were beaten and locked in cellars [at Haut de la Garenne]."

Allegations circled around Savile for decades, but due to his establishment connections he was protected. In 1990, the Queen honoured Savile with a knighthood (Member of the Order of the British Empire).

The revelations have only emerged now because Savile died last year and can no longer be protected by libel laws.

4. Ted Heath - the British prime Minister (1970-74) was a well-known sexual degenerate and pedophile.

On Heath's pedophilia, T Stokes writes:


"He would regularly take boys from certain care homes away on his boat for weekends. His sheets had to be perfectly white, clean ironed and perfumed, Heaths obsession with this made the boats name 'morning cloud' the subject of many in house jokes, nevertheless he was seriously warned 4 times by the police for hanging around public toilets, special branch had to appoint a man especially to protect him.

The name 'Mr. Eddy' was well known on Hampstead Heath and the boys home nearby in the seventies."

It seems to be the rule, rather than the exception, that British PM's are pedos!
(Blair & Pope Benedict exchange Masonic handshake.)
5. Tony Blair -Prime Minister Blair ordered a D-Notice, the draconian British law that prohibits the press from talking about certain 'national security cases', to protect pedophiles working in his administration.

In 1999, an international investigation of child pornographers and pedophiles run by Britain's National Criminal Intelligence Service, code named Operation Ore, resulting in thousands of names of suspected pedophiles.

The problem? The names of powerful people in government kept cropping up. Former NSA analyst Wayne Madsen reported:

"In early 2003, British police began to close in on some top suspects in the Operation Ore investigation, including senior members of Blair's government.

Police also discovered links between British Labour government pedophile suspects and the trafficking of children for purposes of prostitution from Belgium and Portugal (including young boys from the Casa Pia orphanage in Portugal)."

To hide the scandal, Blair issued a D-Notice, resulting in a gag order on the press from publishing any details of the investigation. This allowed his buddies to be discharged without public outcry.

6. Ben Fellows' Testimony - The British entertainment industry is crawling with pedophiles, says Ben Fellows, a former child actor who worked in theatre productions and TV.

"I ran a gauntlet of pedophiles - both at the BBC and at other television production companies, and also in theatres, as well as on commercial photo shoots."

 During productions, staff would warn him to stay away from certain actors who were known to be pedophiles. He was in danger when he ran into them backstage.

 He gives an example: "I was chased around the dressing room by a naked actor who had invited me into their dressing room at the Theatre Royal in Drury Lane - and this actor was extremely famous. I was advised by the director of the musical that I was not to complain, or tell anyone of this incident. I was thirteen years old... so I didn't."

His testimony is full of shocking detail. On one occasion he was seduced by a female BBC producer who regularly had sex with teenage boys. On another he was molested by cabinet minister Ken Clarke MP, who gave him alcohol and groped his penis through his trousers.

Fellows says he knows child actors who committed suicide because of the abuse they suffered. However, abuse by homosexuals somehow doesn't come under "bullying." 

CONCLUSION

We Brits were told to be very nationalistic during the recent London Olympics. People waved union jacks and held street parties. 

Call me anti-social, but I don't want to celebrate a country run by pedophiles.

The case is closed. The only question that remains: are Brits ready to face the truth and do something about it?

Related - 

Monday, November 26, 2012

Saudi King Abdullah 'clinically dead', according to reports

Published November 26th, 2012 - 11:38 GMT via SyndiGate.info Saudi King, Abdullah bin Abdul Aziz, has been in a state of 'clinic... thumbnail 1 summary
Published November 26th, 2012 - 11:38 GMT via SyndiGate.info

Saudi King, Abdullah bin Abdul Aziz, has been in a state of 'clinical death' for the past two days, according to Arabic newspaper, Asharq Alawsat.

A report by the paper claimed that medical staff in Saudi Arabia have confirmed that the King's basic organs are no longer working.

According to the source: 'The fate of the king will be determined within three to four days.'

The news seemingly contradicts reports from the Saudi Royal Court, which publicly announced that the eleven hour operation had been a success. According to state news agency, SPA, the monarch, believed to be in his late 80s, was in hospital for surgery to tighten a ligament in his back.

News of the King's 'clinical death' has raised questions over who will be his successor.

With the current Crown Prince of Saudi, Prince Salman, 76, next in line for the throne, Asharq Alawsat's source claims his brother, Prince Mohammed bin Nayef has deployed forces to contest the succession.

The Saudi Royal Office denied the allegations.

Friday, November 23, 2012

Ashura in the Quran

Syeikh Imran Hosein Audio Lectures - 2007-8 Lecture Tour Saturday, 09 Muharram 1431 Recorded at Masjid us Sabr, Parkwood Estate, Cape To... thumbnail 1 summary

Syeikh Imran Hosein
Audio Lectures - 2007-8 Lecture Tour
Saturday, 09 Muharram 1431
Recorded at Masjid us Sabr, Parkwood Estate, Cape Town.



Sejarah sudah pasti berulang kembali. 

Hazrat Musa as dan kaumnya Bani Israel telah diselamatkan dari Firaun Mesir oleh mukjizat perpisahan laut pada hari Asyura. Ia adalah untuk sebab ini bahawa orang-orang Yahudi berpuasa pada hari ini.

Hubungkait perjuangan dan kemenangan epik Nabi Musa as keatas Firaun pada Hari 'Asyura serta implikasi umat yang hidup pada era mayat Firaun ditemui semula sebagai petanda peperangan mutlak di akhir zaman antara haq dan bathil sudah kian hampir untuk berlaku.

Antara Nurul Izzah dan Dr Musdah: Realiti sebalik tabir tudung & hijab

Prof. Dr. Siti Musdah Mulia meraih penghargaan sebagai “Women of the Year 2009″ dari Il Premio Internazionale La Donna Dell ‘Anno (Inter... thumbnail 1 summary
Prof. Dr. Siti Musdah Mulia meraih penghargaan sebagai “Women of the Year 2009″ dari Il Premio Internazionale La Donna Dell ‘Anno (International Prize for the Woman of the Year) 2009. Upacara penyerahan penghargaan berlangsung di Hotel Grand Billia, Saint Vincent, Aosta, Italia (27/11/2009), dihadiri oleh sekitar 200 undangan dan wartawan.
Kemanakah halatuju umat Melayu Islam menjelang PRU13 agaknya jika masih tidak mampu lagi membezakan agenda kesesatan yang dipaparkan secara terang-terang di depan mata mereka sendiri? Terang dan nyata sokongan yang dibuat oleh Nurul Izzah yang jelas sekali mengalu-alukan orang Melayu untuk bebas memilih agama, dan menyokong agar umat Islam bebas untuk Murtad dan memilih agama lain.


Nurul Izzah tegar menyokong pluralisme dan liberalisme di Malaysia, sama seperti bapanya yang menyokong hubungan sejenis dan menyokong kebebasan Lina Joy untuk murtad. Kemanakah pergi tokoh-tokoh PAS seperti Hadi Awang, Nik Aziz, yang lantang bersuara "mempertahankan" Islam tetapi senyap sepi tidak berani mengatakan atau menegur Nurul Izzah sekeras-kerasnya. 


Yang terkini semasa persidangan Muktammar PAS ke-58 ‘Timbalan Ketua Muslimat’ PAS, Dr. Siti Mariah Mahmud, mengeluarkan kenyataan:
“Adalah satu tuduhan yang tak masuk akal menuduh seorang muslimah mukminah, yang solat, yang puasa, yang tutup aurat mengajak orang Melayu meninggalkan Islam dan menyokong orang Melayu Murtad."
Mereka jelas mempertahankan bahawa Nurul Izzah tidak bersalah, tidak menyokong ke'murtad'an dan tidak menggalakkan orang Melayu beragama Islam Murtad, kerana pada mereka orang yang bertudung, menutup aurat, beserban, pasti tidak akan mengajak orang melakukan kejahatan, mereka ini tidak akan melakukan dosa, mereka ini pada tanggapan PAS itu sempurna tanpa ragu-ragu lagi.

Tidakkah mereka tahu golongan ini ada antaranya hanya hipokrit, munafik, berlakon dengan tudung dan hijab, memesongkan serta menyesatkan umat Islam yang lain?

Individu diatas berhijab dan menutup aurat, dan seringkali tampil didalam forum serta pentas antarabangsa mengenai isu yang berkaitan dengan Islam. Individu tersebut bernama Dr Siti Musdah.

Didalam satu artikel yang bertajuk "Ada Apa dengan Kebebasan Agama?", Dr Siti Musdah menyebut

hak kebebasan beragama bersifat mutlak, berada di dalam forum internum yang merupakan wujud dari inner freedom (freedom to be), dan itu termasuk hak non-derogable (tak bisa ditangguhkan pemenuhannya oleh negara dalam keadaan apa pun)”

Walaupun Dr Siti Musdah menutup aurat dan memakai Hijab. Beliau merupakan penyokong kuat pergerakan Islam Liberal. Prof Dr. Siti Musdah Mulia menerima anugerah Wanita Antarabangsa Anugerah Keberanian pada tahun 2007 atas usaha beliau untuk menyokong hak asasi manusia dan liberalisme, mendakwa bahawa Islam menerima kebebasan dalam agama.  Artikel terpesong dan menyesatkan ini telah diutarakan di The Jakarta Post bertajuk 'Siti Musdah Mulia: A Courageous Woman'

Wanita yang bertudung menutup aurat ini jugalah yang pejuang dan aktivis tegar LGBT (Komuniti lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender).

Apakah tidak jelas lagi bahawa fahaman yang cuba dibawa Nurul Izzah ini semata-mata pecahan daripada pemikiran liberal dan plural Dr Musdah. Dan sedarlah wahai rakyat Malaysia beragama Islam, tidak semestinya mereka yang bertudung, menutup aurat, sopan santun, dan lemah lembut ini sentiasa membawa ajaran yang benar.

Malah mereka ini hanya bermain wayang agama untuk menyesatkan dan memesongkan sepertimana Nurul Izzah cuba memesongkan akidah orang Melayu beragama Islam dengan mengeluarkan kenyataannya melalui forum tersebut.

Thursday, November 22, 2012

Can Mere Hijab Justifies Nurul Izzah’s Statement?

Aiman Amani – In response to Nurul Izzah’s statement on 3rd November, ‘Timbalan Ketua Muslimat’ PAS,  Dr. Siti Mariah Mahmud, made a state... thumbnail 1 summary
Aiman Amani – In response to Nurul Izzah’s statement on 3rd November, ‘Timbalan Ketua Muslimat’ PAS, Dr. Siti Mariah Mahmud, made a statement on 7th November saying:

“Adalah satu tuduhan yang tak masuk akal menuduh seorang muslimah mukminah, yang solat, yang puasa, yang tutup aurat mengajak orang Melayu meninggalkan Islam dan menyokong orang Melayu Murtad.” (It is a nonsensical accusation to accuse a Muslimah Mukminah, who prays, fasts, (and) cover her aurahs to suggest to the Malays to leave Islam and support the Muslim apostates).

Is it true, Dr. Mariah? So what does a person who prays, fasts, (and) covers her aurahs meant when she says,“When you ask me, there is no compulsion in religion… how can anyone say, ‘Sorry, this (religious freedom) only applies to non-Malays’? It has to apply equally” ?

Please take a look at  Prof. Dr. Musdah Mulia (I have no idea whether she really prays or fasts) but she wears hijab and dressed in Muslimah clothing. She claims to be a good Muslim and a popular ‘Muslim’ leader in Indonesia. She served as Senior Advisor of the Minister of Religious Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia from 2000 to 2007 and head of Research Division of The Council of Indonesian Ulema (MUI) from 2000 to 2005. She does looks like a great Muslim lady.

Dr. Siti Musdah Mulia (R) receiving her International Women of Courage Award in Washington.
In February, 2010, the Institute for Policy Research and Advocacy published an article ‘Ada Apa Dengan Kebebasan Agama’ (What is it with freedom of religion?) written by Dr. Musdah Mulia where it says:

“hak kebebasan beragama bersifat mutlak, berada di dalam forum internum yang merupakan wujud dari inner freedom (freedom to be), dan itu termasuk hak non-derogable (tak bisa ditangguhkan pemenuhannya oleh negara dalam keadaan apa pun)”

Siti Musdah and Nurul Izzah’s father, Anwar Ibrahim.
Even though Dr. Siti Musdah Mulia covers her aurah and wearing her hijab, she is a Liberal Muslim activist. In 2007, she received the International Women of Courage Award for her efforts on supporting human rights and liberalism, claiming that Islam accepts freedom in religion. As it was reported on The Jakarta Post on an article ‘Siti Musdah Mulia: A Courageous Woman’:

One of the rights she is fighting for is the state’s guarantee of freedom of religion. Musdah believes pluralism is a must to build the country.

“Pluralism is the key for the continuation of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia,” she said.


She is also known for supporting the LGBTs, claiming that they should be respected and dignified by Muslims. She promoted and supported the so called ‘Lesbian Muslim’, Irshad Manji, by calling her a ‘Muslimah Mujtahidah’.  Two years earlier, the Jakarta Post published an article ‘Islam ‘Recognizes Homosexuality’, also featuring Musdah Mulia:
Moderate Muslim scholars said there were no reasons to reject homosexuals under Islam, and that the condemnation of homosexuals and homosexuality by mainstream ulema and many other Muslims was based on narrow-minded interpretations of Islamic teachings.

“There is no difference between lesbians and nonlesbians. In the eyes of God, people are valued based on their piety,” she told the discussion organized by nongovernmental organization Arus Pelang.

“The essence of the religion (Islam) is to humanize humans, respect and dignify them.”

Musdah said homosexuality was from God and should be considered natural, adding it was not pushed only by passion.


It is rather odd, if wearing a hijab is enough to show one’s faith and her understanding of Islam. After all, as Helen Ang had often pointed out, even Hannah Yeoh sometimes wears hijab. Or does that means she too would never “suggest the Malays to leave Islam and support the Muslim apostates”; especially since Hannah Yeoh is from PAS’s ally party DAP – the party led by non-Muslim leaders whom according to PAS’s spiritual leader understand Islam better than UMNO’s Muslim leaders?
A group of Muslimah with Hannah Yeoh (in the middle).
I think that as a Muslim leader Dr. Mariah should understand the implications of Nurul Izzah’s words at the forum to the Muslims especially to the PR members and supporters who idolised Nurul Izzah.
It is very important for Dr. Mariah to put Islam first in making any judgment and not making foolish statements just to show her support for Anwar’s Ibrahim’s daughter. Or maybe  Dr. Mariah doesn’t know what she was saying when she made the statement. Either those or we’re going to hear about ‘Hannah Yeoh: An exemplary figure for Muslimah Mukminah’ from her soon.

Saturday, November 17, 2012

The Invasion of Gaza: Part of a Broader US-NATO-Israel Military Agenda. Towards a Scenario of Military Escalation?

On November 14,  Hamas military commander Ahmed Jabari was murdered in a Israeli missile attack. In a bitter irony,  barely a fe... thumbnail 1 summary

On November 14,  Hamas military commander Ahmed Jabari was murdered in a Israeli missile attack. In a bitter irony,  barely a few hours before the attack, Hamas received  the draft proposal of a permanent truce agreement with Israel.

“Hours before Hamas strongman Ahmed Jabari was assassinated, he received the draft of a permanent truce agreement with Israel, which included mechanisms for maintaining the cease-fire in the case of a flare-up between Israel and the factions in the Gaza Strip.”(Haaretz, November 15, 2012)

The targeted assassination  of  Ahmed Jabari was followed by an extensive bombing campaign under Operation Pillar of Cloud.  The latter consists of a carefully planned military endeavor.

F-16 fighter planes, Apache helicopters and unmanned drones were deployed. Israeli naval forces deployed along the Gaza shoreline were  involved in extensive shelling of civilian targets.

Israel’s defense minister Ehud Barack has confirmed a scenario of military escalation, blaming Palestine for having committed acts of aggression:

 “[t]he provocations we have suffered and the firing of rockets to the southern settlements within Israel have forced us to take this action. I want to make clear that Israeli citizens will not suffer such actions. The targets are to hit the rockets and to harm the organization of Hamas.”

The Israeli attacks were followed by the firing of dozens of rockets by Hamas against Israel.

Palestine’s response was known to Israeli war planners. The resulting Israeli civilian casualties are now being used to justify military escalation on humanitarian grounds.
What we are dealing with is a carefully planned operation, a clear act of provocation. The deaths of Israeli civilians (envisaged and foreseen by IDF military planners) are being used to muster the support of the Israeli  public.

Meanwhile, the Israeli attack is casually portrayed by the Western media as part of a legitimate counter-terrorism agenda.

The Obama administration is blaming the victims of Israeli atrocities. The victims are portrayed as “terrorists”.  According to White House Press Secretary Jay Carney:
“Hamas [is] a U.S.-designated terror group, which governs the Gaza strip, that is instigating the violence. … Attacking Israel on a near daily basis does nothing to help Palestinians in Gaza or to move the Palestinian people any close to achieving self-determination.” (ABC News, November 15, 2012)

A scenario of military escalation has already been announced. Reports confirm that Israeli is contemplating a ground war, including an invasion of Gaza:
There are also reports that Israel may be preparing for a ground operation as it moves troops near the border. A ground incursion by Israel into Gaza could signal the beginning of an all-out war. (Ibid)

The Broader Middle East War
The attack on Gaza must be understood in relation to the broader Middle East war. The Israeli attack was approved by president Obama. It  has a direct bearing on US-NATO-Israeli war plans pertaining to Lebanon, Syria and Iran.
The timing is of utmost significance: one week following the US presidential elections.
Operation Pillar of Cloud is a deliberate act of provocation, intended to lead to military escalation.

The Israeli public is firmly opposed to a broader Middle East war including the conduct of Israeli surgical strikes directed against Iran’s  nuclear facilities.
Is the attack on Gaza  a trigger mechanism which could lead the World into a broader Middle East war?

We are not dealing with an isolated event. The invasion of Gaza is part of the broader US-NATO-Israel military agenda.

Back-flash to December 2008. Operation Cast Lead
It is also important to understand Israeli’s current plans to invade Gaza in relation to the December 2008 bombing and ground invasion of Gaza under Operation Cast Lead.  (See below)

Michel Chossudovsky, November 15, 2012
______________________________________________
by Michel Chossudovsky
Global Research, January 4, 2009

The aerial bombings and the ongoing ground invasion of Gaza by Israeli ground forces must be analysed in a historical context. Operation “Cast Lead” is a carefully planned undertaking, which is part of a broader military-intelligence agenda first formulated by the government of Prime Minister Ariel Sharon in 2001:
“Sources in the defense establishment said Defense Minister Ehud Barak instructed the Israel Defense Forces to prepare for the operation over six months ago, even as Israel was beginning to negotiate a ceasefire agreement with Hamas.”(Barak Ravid, Operation “Cast Lead”: Israeli Air Force strike followed months of planning, Haaretz, December 27, 2008)
It was Israel which broke the truce on the day of the US presidential elections, November 4:
“Israel used this distraction to break the ceasefire between itself and Hamas by bombing the Gaza strip.  Israel claimed this violation of the ceasefire was to prevent Hamas from digging tunnels into Israeli territory.

The very next day, Israel launched a terrorizing siege of Gaza, cutting off food, fuel, medical supplies and other necessities in an attempt to “subdue” the Palestinians while at the same time engaging in armed incursions.
In response, Hamas and others in Gaza again resorted to firing crude, homemade, and mainly inaccurate rockets into Israel.  During the past seven years, these rockets have been responsible for the deaths of 17 Israelis.  Over the same time span, Israeli Blitzkrieg assaults have killed thousands of Palestinians, drawing worldwide protest but falling on deaf ears at the UN.” (Shamus Cooke, The Massacre in Palestine and the Threat of a Wider War, Global Research, December 2008)
Planned Humanitarian Disaster
On December 8, US Deputy Secretary of State John Negroponte was in Tel Aviv for discussions with his Israeli counterparts including the director of Mossad, Meir Dagan.
“Operation Cast Lead” was initiated two days day after Christmas. It was coupled with a carefully designed international Public Relations campaign under the auspices of Israel’s Foreign Ministry.

Hamas’ military targets are not the main objective. Operation “Cast Lead” is intended, quite deliberately, to trigger civilian casualities.

What we are dealing with is a “planned humanitarian disaster” in Gaza in a densly populated urban area. (See map below)


The longer term objective of this plan, as formulated by Israeli policy makers, is the expulsion of Palestinians from Palestinian lands:
“Terrorize the civilian population, assuring maximal destruction of property and cultural resources… The daily life of the Palestinians must be rendered unbearable: They should be locked up in cities and towns, prevented from exercising normal economic life, cut off from workplaces, schools and hospitals, This will encourage emigration and weaken the resistance to future expulsions” Ur Shlonsky, quoted by Ghali Hassan, Gaza: The World’s Largest Prison, Global Research, 2005)
“Operation Justified Vengeance”

A turning point has been reached. Operation “Cast Lead” is part of the broader military-intelligence operation initiated at the outset of the Ariel Sharon government in 2001. It was under Sharon’s “Operation Justified Vengeance” that  F-16 fighter planes were initially used to bomb Palestinian cities.

“Operation Justified Vengeance” was presented in July 2001 to the Israeli government of Ariel Sharon by IDF chief of staff Shaul Mofaz, under the title “The Destruction of the Palestinian Authority and Disarmament of All Armed Forces”.
“A contingency plan, codenamed Operation Justified Vengeance, was drawn up last June [2001] to reoccupy all of the West Bank and possibly the Gaza Strip at a likely cost of “hundreds” of Israeli casualties.” (Washington Times, 19 March 2002).
According to Jane’s ‘Foreign Report’ (July 12, 2001) the Israeli army under Sharon had updated its plans for an “all-out assault to smash the Palestinian authority, force out leader Yasser Arafat and kill or detain its army”.

“Bloodshed Justification”

The “Bloodshed Justification” was an essential component of the military-intelligence agenda. The killing of Palestinian civilians was justified on “humanitarian grounds.” Israeli military operations were carefully timed to coincide with the suicide attacks:
The assault would be launched, at the government’s discretion, after a big suicide bomb attack in Israel, causing widespread deaths and injuries, citing the bloodshed as justification. (Tanya Reinhart, Evil Unleashed, Israel’s move to destroy the Palestinian Authority is a calculated plan, long in the making, Global Research, December 2001, emphasis added)
The Dagan Plan 

“Operation Justified Vengeance” was also referred to as the “Dagan Plan”, named after General (ret.) Meir Dagan, who currently heads Mossad, Israel’s intelligence agency.
Reserve General Meir Dagan was Sharon’s national security adviser during the 2000 election campaign. The plan was apparently drawn up prior to Sharon’s election as Prime Minister in February 2001. “According to Alex Fishman writing in Yediot Aharonot, the Dagan Plan consisted in destroying the Palestinian authority and putting Yasser Arafat ‘out of the game’.” (Ellis Shulman, “Operation Justified Vengeance”: a Secret Plan to Destroy the Palestinian Authority, March 2001):
“As reported in the Foreign Report [Jane] and disclosed locally by Maariv, Israel’s invasion plan — reportedly dubbed Justified Vengeance — would be launched immediately following the next high-casualty suicide bombing, would last about a month and is expected to result in the death of hundreds of Israelis and thousands of Palestinians. (Ibid, emphasis added)
The “Dagan Plan” envisaged the so-called “cantonization” of the Palestinian territories whereby the West Bank and Gaza would be totally cut off from one other, with separate “governments” in each of the territories. Under this scenario, already envisaged in 2001, Israel would:
 ”negotiate separately with Palestinian forces that are dominant in each territory-Palestinian forces responsible for security, intelligence, and even for the Tanzim (Fatah).” The plan thus closely resembles the idea of “cantonization” of Palestinian territories, put forth by a number of ministers.” Sylvain Cypel, The infamous ‘Dagan Plan’ Sharon’s plan for getting rid of Arafat, Le Monde, December 17, 2001)
From Left to Right: Dagan, Sharon, Halevy
The Dagan Plan has established continuity in the military-intelligence agenda. In the wake of the 2000 elections, Meir Dagan was assigned a key role. “He became Sharon’s “go-between” in security issues with President’s Bush’s special envoys Zinni and Mitchell.”  

He was subsequently appointed Director of the Mossad by Prime Minister Ariel Sharon in August 2002. In the post-Sharon period, he remained head of Mossad. He was reconfirmed in his position as Director of Israeli Intelligence by Prime Minister Ehud Olmert in June 2008.
Meir Dagan, in coordination with his US counterparts, has been in charge of various military-intelligence operations. It is worth noting that Meir Dagan as a young Colonel had worked closely with defense minister Ariel Sharon in the raids on Palestinian settlements in Beirut in 1982. The 2009 ground invasion of Gaza, in many regards, bear a canny resemblance to the 1982 military operation led by Sharon and Dagan.

Continuity: From Sharon  to Olmert

Olmert and Sharon
It is important to focus on a number of key events which have led up to the killings in Gaza under “Operation Cast Lead”:

1. The assassination in November 2004 of Yaser Arafat. This assassination had been on the drawing board since 1996 under “Operation Fields of Thorns”. According to an October 2000 document “prepared by the security services, at the request of then Prime Minister Ehud Barak, stated that ‘Arafat, the person, is a severe threat to the security of the state [of Israel] and the damage which will result from his disappearance is less than the damage caused by his existence’”. (Tanya Reinhart, Evil Unleashed, Israel’s move to destroy the Palestinian Authority is a calculated plan, long in the making, Global Research, December 2001. Details of the document were published in Ma’ariv, July 6, 2001.).

Arafat’s assassination was ordered in 2003 by the Israeli cabinet. It was approved by the US which vetoed a United Nations Security Resolution condemning the 2003 Israeli Cabinet decision. Reacting to increased Palestinian attacks, in August 2003, Israeli Defense Minister Shaul Mofaz declared “all out war” on the militants whom he vowed “marked for death.”
“In mid September, Israel’s government passed a law to get rid of Arafat. Israel’s cabinet for political security affairs declared it “a decision to remove Arafat as an obstacle to peace.” Mofaz threatened; “we will choose the right way and the right time to kill Arafat.” Palestinian Minister Saeb Erekat told CNN he thought Arafat was the next target. CNN asked Sharon spokesman Ra’anan Gissan if the vote meant expulsion of Arafat. Gissan clarified; “It doesn’t mean that. The Cabinet has today resolved to remove this obstacle. The time, the method, the ways by which this will take place will be decided separately, and the security services will monitor the situation and make the recommendation about proper action.” (See Trish Shuh, Road Map for a Decease Plan,  www.mehrnews.com November 9 2005.
The assassination of Arafat was part of the 2001 Dagan Plan. In all likelihood, it was carried out by Israeli Intelligence. It was intended to destroy the Palestinian Authority, foment divisions within Fatah as well as between Fatah and Hamas. Mahmoud Abbas is a Palestinian quisling. He was installed as leader of Fatah, with the approval of Israel and the US, which finance the Palestinian Authority’s paramilitary and security forces.


2. The removal, under the orders of Prime Minister Ariel Sharon in 2005, of all Jewish settlements in Gaza. A Jewish population of over 7,000 was relocated.
“It is my intention [Sharon] to carry out an evacuation – sorry, a relocation – of settlements that cause us problems and of places that we will not hold onto anyway in a final settlement, like the Gaza settlements…. I am working on the assumption that in the future there will be no Jews in Gaza,” Sharon said.” (CBC, March 2004)
The issue of the settlements in Gaza was presented as part of Washington’s “road map to peace”. Celebrated by the Palestinians as a “victory”, this measure was not directed against the Jewish settlers. Quite the opposite: It was part of  the overall covert operation, which consisted  in transforming Gaza into a concentration camp. As long as Jewish settlers were living inside Gaza, the objective of sustaining a large barricaded prison territory could not be achieved. The Implementation of “Operation Cast Lead” required “no Jews in Gaza”.
3. The building of the infamous Apartheid Wall was decided upon at the beginning of the Sharon government. (See Map below).


4. The next phase was the Hamas election victory in January 2006. Without Arafat, the Israeli military-intelligence architects knew that Fatah under Mahmoud Abbas would loose the elections. This was part of the scenario, which had been envisaged and analyzed well in advance.

With Hamas in charge of the Palestinian authority, using the pretext that Hamas is a terrorist organization, Israel would carry out the process of “cantonization” as formulated under the Dagan plan. Fatah under Mahmoud Abbas would remain formally in charge of the West Bank. The duly elected Hamas government would be confined to the Gaza strip.
Ground Attack

On January 3, Israeli tanks and infantry entered Gaza in an all out ground offensive:
“The ground operation was preceded by several hours of heavy artillery fire after dark, igniting targets in flames that burst into the night sky. Machine gun fire rattled as bright tracer rounds flashed through the darkness and the crash of hundreds of shells sent up streaks of fire. (AP, January 3, 2009)
Israeli sources have pointed to a lengthy drawn out military operation. It “won’t be easy and it won’t be short,” said Defense Minister Ehud Barak in a TV address.
Israel is not seeking to oblige Hamas “to cooperate”. What we are dealing with is the implementation of the “Dagan Plan” as initially formulated in 2001, which called for:
“an invasion of Palestinian-controlled territory by some 30,000 Israeli soldiers, with the clearly defined mission of destroying the infrastructure of the Palestinian leadership and collecting weaponry currently possessed by the various Palestinian forces, and expelling or killing its military leadership. (Ellis Shulman, op cit, emphasis added)
The broader question is whether Israel in consultation with Washington is intent upon triggering a wider war.

Mass expulsion could occur at some later stage of the ground invasion, were the Israelis to open up Gaza’s borders to allow for an exodus of population. Expulsion was referred to by Ariel Sharon as the “a 1948 style solution”. For Sharon “it is only necessary to find another state for the Palestinians. -’Jordan is Palestine’ – was the phrase that Sharon coined.” (Tanya Reinhart, op cit)

"Berfikir tanpa kotak"

Ar Ra'isul Mutakallim, Tabligh Ki Zabaan (Lidah Tabligh) Hadrat Maulana Umar Palanpuri Rahmatullahu 'alaihi berkata: "Orang yang kuat adalah orang yang sanggup bertahan dalam arus kerosakan. Orang yang lebih kuat adalah orang yang sanggup melawan arus kerosakan. Namun orang yang paling kuat adalah orang yang sanggup merubah arah arus kerosakan hingga menjadi akannya arus kebaikan.”

“Dajjal bersama tenteranya mempunyai kekuatan yang amat istimewa dan amat tersusun. Begitu juga Yakjuj dan Makjuj membuat huru-hara di seluruh dunia. Kehebatan mereka tiada siapa yang dapat melawan dan orang beriman berundur dengan hanya makan zikir dan tasbih."

"Allah zahirkan kudratnya hanya dengan labah-labah yang kecil dijadikan asbab untuk menggigit tengkuk-tengkuk mereka hingga mati. Mayat mereka begitu busuk diseluruh dunia. Orang beriman tidak tahan terus berdoa pada Allah. Allah ta'ala hantarkan hujan dan banjir menghanyutkan mereka ke laut. Inilah yang akan berlaku di akhir zaman nanti."

"Amalan dakwah memisahkan hak dan batil seperti air menghanyutkan sampah dari emas dan logam-logam yang lain. Namun pekerja² agama jika wujud cinta dunia dalam hati mereka seperti emas dan disaluti logam-logam lain, maka banyak masalah yang akan timbul.”