Monday, July 1, 2013

The Woolwich Terror exposed: Staged State Terror

Yet another War-On-Terror sham scam by the powers that be. The Engineering of Sentiments:The Woolwich Terror Hoax Introd... thumbnail 1 summary
Yet another War-On-Terror sham scam by the powers that be.

Thirteen years has passed since that fateful Tuesday morning, one that for many Americans, crystallized a suspected link between Islam and violence. In that time, sadly enough, unfavorable views of Islam have increased steadily. Out of collective national heartache, a rising climate of hate and mistrust has grown.

Two years after 19 of the world’s 1.3 billion Muslims attacked the World Trade Center and Pentagon, an ABC News poll found that 34 percent of Americans believed that Islam encourages violence. Five years later, in 2008, despite the rarity of religiously inspired attacks, that number rose sharply to 48 percent. Today, the pattern of skepticism continues. A Washington Post-ABC News poll released in September 2010 suggested that half of Americans harbor negative views of Islam, the highest number recorded since the al-Qaeda attacks in 2001.
Correspondingly in the midst of escalating anti Muslim sentiment, reported hate crimes against Muslims appear to be on the rise.

From 2000 to 2001, hate crimes in the United States against people of Middle Eastern descent increased by more than 324 percent, with 354 attacks in 2000 and 1,501 reported attacks in 2001.

The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) noted that hate crimes against Muslims in the United States rose by more than 50 percent from 2003 to 2004.  And by 2009, not much had changed.

Pew Research released a report saying that “Eight years after the terrorist attacks of 9/11, Americans see Muslims as facing more discrimination inside the U.S. than any other major religious group.”  Ibrahim Hooper, a spokesman for CAIR, said in the fall of 2010, “I have been working on behalf of other Muslims for more than 30 years and I have never seen it like this, not even after the 9/11 attacks. Hate rhetoric often leads to hate crimes, and I think that’s what we’re seeing now.”

We need look no further than this past summer as proof of that. The Sikh temple shooting — where worshippers were not targeted for their religion but for their dark skin, turbans, beards, and foreign names — as well as mosque vandalisms, arsons, and assaults on Muslim Americans are evidence of a growing climate of hate.

Despite efforts on the part of President George W. Bush, President Obama, various members of Congress, and American Muslim organizations to distinguish between violent acts of individual Muslims and the quintessential nature of their Muslim faith, such endeavors have often been overpowered by a counter-narrative that exploits realistic fears and represents Islam as a violent threat to not only American values but the future of America itself.

The Islamic bogeyman represents the newest chapter in America’s long history of monster stories. Given the vast displays of violence committed by Muslim extremists, such an emergence only seemed inevitable. Like the threat of the Bavarian Illuminati in the late 1790s, the alleged infiltration of Catholics in the 1850s, and fears of a Communist takeover throughout the 1900s, actual world events have provoked the outbreak of fears in certain quarters of the country and the fear of Islam is no exception.

But also like the monsters of the nation’s past, the Islamic threat has been seized upon by a cadre of individuals—an industry of Islamophobia—that use lurid imagery, emotive language, charged stereotypes, and repetition, to exacerbate fears of a larger-than-life, ever-lurking Muslim presence.

This industry is largely, though not exclusively, comprised of ideologically driven, right-wing activists, many of whom identify themselves as evangelical Christians and have found a chorus of like-minded enthusiasts within the Tea Party movement and various political and social fringe groups. Despite their peripheral location within American society, their outcries over a suspected Muslim takeover have gained traction within more mainstream, moderate communities.

In the summer of 2010, a rising tide of anti-Muslim sentiment and violence swept through the United States, generated by a controversy that surrounded the construction of a Muslim community center in lower Manhattan. 

Two blocks away from the site of the 2001 attacks on the World Trade Center, Park51, as the development would be called, reawakened the suppressed emotions of a nation deeply wounded by the tragedy. Opponents of the project cited its location as their primary point of contention. For them, building a “monster mosque” so close to Ground Zero was offensive because Muslims, however deviant in their beliefs, were responsible for the massacre there nine years before.

And, because the developers of Park51 were Muslims too, there must have been a link—the Quran found in Mohammad Atta’s bag contained the same verses that would be preached to Muslims attending worship in the building’s mosque, they believed. 

The center was also, according to some, an omen that warned of a larger Muslim takeover. By infiltrating lower Manhattan, they claimed, Muslims would use the mosque as a command center for terrorism and dispatch extremists all across the heartland of the United States, uprooting governments state by state until Sharia law replaced the Constitution.

The conspiratorial theories of historical monster conquests reemerged at Park 51 and have also reemerged in other similar public paroxysms over “creeping Sharia” law, “stealth jihad,” and “terror babies.” But unlike the earlier historic scares which were born in church pulpits, on front porches, and in government offices, the tide of recent anti-Muslim sentiment was nurtured on the Internet where, with the single click of a mouse, it went viral, spreading to every corner of the country overnight. The Islamophobia Industry: How the Right Manufactures Fear of Muslims

The  Woolwich Terror Hoax 

(Video) Kent Freedom Movement investigate the Woolwich false flag psy ops PT1

A short walk from the Woolwich DLR station takes you to a moving tribute scene, a huge mass of flowers, national flags and various gifts, to a ‘Fuselier Guard’ whose death became known on 22nd May: Drummer Lee Rigby. Deep are the passions aroused by this death, which have echoed around our world.

We are here dealing with a constructed terror event where nothing is what it appeared to be: actors act their parts and the media report as they are told.
The primal War-on-Terror theme has been powerfully reinforced by this mirage, as ‘the Phantom Menace’ strikes again.

We here go through the sequence of apparent events, examining a series of what I will call Absolute Physical Impossibilities.

A car ends up on the pavement of a busy street under some trees. Because of the way it is facing it would have had to veer over from the other side of the road, having just emerged from a traffic-lights crossing, somehow waiting for a brief gap in the traffic to cross over – and bump up onto a good 4” pavement, then somehow drive along until, whump! It hit DLR (Drummer Lee Rigby). He was walking away from them just by a traffic sign held up by two posts, wearing a ‘Help the Heroes’ T-shirt.

First Absolute Physical Impossibility: this could only have been synchronised by an overhead helicopter, to see DLR walking along, see the gap in the traffic, see the lights changing, and then give the car its instructions. There was no such helicopter.

On the story we are given, there is no way the car driver could have identified DLR, given the brief second or so between possibly seeing him and deciding to drive across the road. And yet the whole point of the story, is that ‘terrorists’ killed a British soldier.

Had such a car been coming towards him bumping up onto on the pavement, an army lad would have been trained to sense it behind him, and he only needed to spring forward a yard or so, other side of the big traffic sign, to have been safe.

Where you might expect the car to have crossed over the road there is a lamp post, ten yards or so from the afore-mentioned traffic sign, so the car would have had to skirt round that lamp post – then further down is a railing, near the traffic lights. We’re talking about Artillery Road, Greenwich where this whole drama was constructed.

Skid-marks on the pavement, coming from the tyres (see below, 2nd picture) – or possibly trails of car oil – point towards that lamp-post, not shown in this image. It could not have happened!

Second Absolute Physical Impossibility: the car had its whole front crumpled up, as if it had hit something, inches from the poles of the traffic sign right in front – yet those poles were untouched, with no scratch from any bump. That has to be a stage setup.  You can’t see the poles now, they are choc-a-bloc with flowers, messages etc but fortunately Morris Herman (‘Morris108′) went there early and reported this central fact.

Woolwich Defies Common Sense - Morris (Video)

And we are supposed to believe the two ‘evil terrorists’ then emerged unharmed from the car, one brandishing a meat cleaver and the other a gun? Why slam the front of the car into something if you have a gun you are intending to use?

On a busy city street, we are supposed to believe that no-one took any photos of this whole sequence of events?

Third Absolute Physical Impossibility: DLR is lying knocked over from the car bump, then one killer starts chopping his head off, causing death. But – there is no blood. Eight pints of red blood should have spurted out onto the pavement.

Picture: You can here two undamaged posts close-up (holding up a traffic sign) – which the car supposedly bumped into. You can see NO BLOOD on pavement. You can also see the lamp-past alluded to (with ‘Signal Timings’ on it) and behind it the railings, so the car would have had to come between these two.

While there is no blood on the pavement, shown by close-up photos of the scene, there is blood seen from an overhead police-helicopter photo. The latter has to be fake.  Quoting here Jim Stone:

“When the helicopter flies over, you can see blood where they supposedly dragged their victim from under the bushes to the road. That blood is NOT THERE in the videos shot before the helicopter arrived, and ALL video is AFTER they drag their supposed victim into the road. That´s one obvious set up team blooper. In Hollywood, that’s what is called a continuity error.”     (May 24th)

The air photo supposedly shows a trail of blood as the body was dragged out into the road. Murderers usually try to hide themselves after committing the act – but, O no, not this one.

In the Daily Mirror video  (part 2, v30 seconds) note various people standing around while the body is heaved out into the road. The road has to have been sealed off in advance – at 2.20 pm on 22 May. That is the only way something could have been dragged into the middle of a busy London road.


All this time there has not been a single photo taken by a civilian passing by.

Fourth absolute physical impossibilityThe corpse supposedly lies in the middle of the road, with no drop of blood around it – for twenty minutes, while the two perps (or rather, patsies) hang around waiting for the police to arrive. What were they waiting for?

2nd picture: again, not a drop of blood to be seen! This time you can just see the traffic sign which the car supposedly bumped into. Casual conversations are here meant to be going on, after a soldier has been hacked to death: clearly no-one expects the Fuselier guard to come storming out of the nearby barracks!

In no photos can the head / lack of head be seen. The t-shirt appears pulled up to possibly cover over the head.

The army does not arrive! This is right outside their barracks, one of their soldiers hacked to death by a ‘wicked terrorist.’  DLR was supposedly coming from London back to his barracks, so he would have had to carry ID to get in. But, the evening paper said merely that he was believed to be a soldier.

Then the identifying was done by his teeth? This is an impossible storyline. We express this as – Fifth Absolute Physical Impossibility: If DLR was returning to his barracks, he would have to have had some physical ID.  Then he would have been identified and the army barracks told. They would have stormed out. If the army did not come out, after half an hour,  it basically means that DLR did not die there – he was already dead.

We see a large white lorry at one end of the road (away from the traffic lights) and a bus containing schoolchildren at the other end, and the road is blocked off for traffic. The bus has been parked opposite the lamp-post alluded to above- there is no bus-stop there.

The Rant

The ‘rant’ by Michael Adibelajo is the most famous image of the whole constructed sequence: the photoshopped blood on his hands, the lady-with-shopping walking by, his MI5 programming.
This was presumably shot well before whatever happened at Woolwich on May 22nd: to quote the perceptive ‘September Clues:

they probably just filmed the guy as they would an interview, TV show or scene from a movie, on the corner of a regular street, somewhere in London. Onlookers and passer-bys don’t see anything out of the ordinary, just a guy giving an interview on a street corner. ..Blood on his hands added in post production.

You can see the extra red-glowing kerb-lines as his red, red hands move about. See the blurred red coming off his hands and sticking onto the trees behind him! You can see the extra red-glowing kerb-lines as his red, red hands move about. See the blurred red coming off his hands and sticking onto the trees behind him! 

Note, no red on his clothes after hacking someone’s head off!

(See here for how the fake blood was added)


All the normal traffic on this busy road has been blocked off.

There are two different camera angles, ie two persons were standing a few feet in front of M.A. as he ranted at them, filming him. Watch the video as the old lady walks by with her shopping trolley, unperturbed. What did she see?  I suggest she saw no red colour on his hands, nor was there any corpse in the road.  And why did they not re-film it, after she had ruined the whole effect, turning it into a joke? Answer: M.A. has to have been programmed by MI5 to rant in this manner, which he did very effectively, however it might not have been easy to get him to ‘do it again.’

Sixth Absolute Physical Impossibility: The carelessly-photoshopped ‘blood’ moves around M.A.s hands, fades away & returns, at one point gets stuck onto the trees behind him.

May 25th: A longtime friend of M.A.was in the  BBC Newsnight studio, telling how he believed M.A. had been tortured and raped by MI5 agents – the security police turn up during te interview, and arrest him as he comes out. See Nafeez Ahmed’s comments here.  His brother worked for MI6 for years.

M.A.’s ex-girlfriend Justine Rigden testified to how he had been ‘lovely’ and just a ‘normal boy’. School friends testify to how he had lived a Western lifestyle, growing up in Essex as a Christian with hard-working Nigerian immigrant parents.

Bad actors arrive
Twenty minutes after the ‘event’ some police lookalikes arrive, but not in real police cars (  Part 2, 4 mins) and are soon firing blanks around the place. One of them is wearing white, trainer-type shoes (5.30 mins) Their arrival is the cue for ‘the terrorists’ to start running towards the police car.


How likely is that? These have to be programmed characters. They do not threaten to attack, but supposedly the police open fire. Note the unlikely way in which a ‘bad actor’ waves his legs about, after supposedly having been shot and lying on the ground (7.20 mins) See the dummy-type human figure dragged into the road by several people (Part 2, 45 seconds)

The Inquest would not comment upon the cause of death. The one thing we need to know from an Inquest, is how long the corpse had been dead. When the court case began of the 22-year old suspect, the cause of death was reported as from ‘multiple injuries.’ If he died from having his head hacked off, why would the inquest not confirm it?

When its all over, ‘The police remove a body bag from the scene:’ this image shows a yellow body bag rather too small, or the body would be quite folded up if it fit into there, and judging by how the two men are carrying it, it does not seem to weigh much.

That bag does not have the weight of a human body. This reinforces the impression from the Mirror footage (above) that some sort of dummy was put into the road. That’s why it didn’t bleed. That’s why no pictures show its head, it was not DLR. Whenever DLR died, rigor mortis might by then have set, so it was not convenient to use his dead body.

In a normal murder scene one would expect to see the body lifted onto a stretcher and put carefully into an ambulance, for the post-mortem.  It would not be crumpled up into a 3-foot body bag! The men carrying it do not look like police.
How strange that we have heard nothing about a funeral of DLR. One would expect it to be  supported by his Fuselier guard regiment – with so many moving tributes on both sides of Artillery road even stretching round the corner, and for this to be given great publicity.

I predict that the two suspects in this case will remain forever silent, we will never be allowed to hear their view of what happened.

See also, ‘Queries over Woolwich terror event.’


"Berfikir tanpa kotak"

Ar Ra'isul Mutakallim, Tabligh Ki Zabaan (Lidah Tabligh) Hadrat Maulana Umar Palanpuri Rahmatullahu 'alaihi berkata: "Orang yang kuat adalah orang yang sanggup bertahan dalam arus kerosakan. Orang yang lebih kuat adalah orang yang sanggup melawan arus kerosakan. Namun orang yang paling kuat adalah orang yang sanggup merubah arah arus kerosakan hingga menjadi akannya arus kebaikan.”

“Dajjal bersama tenteranya mempunyai kekuatan yang amat istimewa dan amat tersusun. Begitu juga Yakjuj dan Makjuj membuat huru-hara di seluruh dunia. Kehebatan mereka tiada siapa yang dapat melawan dan orang beriman berundur dengan hanya makan zikir dan tasbih."

"Allah zahirkan kudratnya hanya dengan labah-labah yang kecil dijadikan asbab untuk menggigit tengkuk-tengkuk mereka hingga mati. Mayat mereka begitu busuk diseluruh dunia. Orang beriman tidak tahan terus berdoa pada Allah. Allah ta'ala hantarkan hujan dan banjir menghanyutkan mereka ke laut. Inilah yang akan berlaku di akhir zaman nanti."

"Amalan dakwah memisahkan hak dan batil seperti air menghanyutkan sampah dari emas dan logam-logam yang lain. Namun pekerja² agama jika wujud cinta dunia dalam hati mereka seperti emas dan disaluti logam-logam lain, maka banyak masalah yang akan timbul.”